Landmark Win: Federal Court Finds NYPD Liable for Unconstitutional Stops-and-Frisks

On August 12, 2013, the Center for Constitutional Rights announced via a press release their landmark win against the New York Police Department's racially discriminatory practice of stop, question and frisk. Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin ruled that the stop-and-frisk tactics of NYPD violated the constitutional rights of mostly Black and Latino men, as it demonstrated a widespread disregard for the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, as well as the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. She also called for a federal monitor to oversee broad reforms as well as community meetings, or a “joint remedial process,” to get public input on these reforms. While this desicion is no doubt a huge win for human rights advocates, there is still more work ahead. 

Click here to read CCR's press release.

Click here to read the NYTimes article on the decision.

Learn more about the statistics behind the desicion

Read the full decision.

 

 
Connected Categorizations: 

Related Information

Press

Federal Court Finds NYPD Liable for Unconstitutional Stops-and-Frisks

Press Release from the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) [On August 12th], a federal judge found the New York City Police Department (NYPD) liable for a pattern and practice of...
More about Federal Court Finds NYPD Liable for Unconstitutional Stops-and-Frisks »»